You built your app with Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, or Replit. It works, but you do not know what it is hiding before real users hit it. An agent fleet scans it, a senior engineer reviews every finding, and I tell you what is fine, fixable, or a rewrite, in writing, within 24 to 48 hours of getting repo access.
One codebase. One written assessment, reviewed by a senior engineer, not just a bot. Within 24 to 48 hours of repo access. If I think you do not need it, I will say so and refund you.
Credited against a Ship Fix if you go ahead.
A Ship Check is $299 flat. An agent fleet runs the volume scan, then a senior engineer reviews every finding and ranks it by real-world risk, so you get a verdict of fine, fixable, or rewrite, what will break first, a security and data read, and a costed plan you can take anywhere, in writing, within about 24 to 48 hours of giving us repo access. It is refundable if you do not need it, and credited against a Ship Fix if you go ahead.
Fine, fixable, or rewrite. One of three, stated plainly on the first line.
The specific things most likely to wake you up, ranked, with where they live in the code.
Exposed keys, open endpoints, auth you should not trust, and what your data would survive.
What I would do, in what order, and roughly what each piece costs. Yours to take anywhere.
Every finding is reviewed and ranked by a senior engineer, not left as raw scanner output. You can hand the whole thing to another developer afterwards. Plenty of people do, and that is fine. I would rather you spend the next ten thousand dollars on the right problem.
Matt did a really thorough security and backend audit of my app and found a handful of issues I'd missed across access control, API keys, and a few of the third-party integrations. What I found most useful was that
he didn't just dump a list on me. He sorted everything by priority so I knew what was actually launch-blocking versus what could wait, and he was straight about which bits I needed to properly understand myself rather than just hand off.
He also explained the reasoning behind each issue and offered to help implement the trickier fixes. Would recommend him to anyone wanting a proper review of their app, rather than a quick once-over.
“Matthew has consistently demonstrated unparalleled dedication, expertise, and a profound commitment to our success.”
“He went above and beyond at every stage. What started as a simple MVP turned into something much more complete and impressive thanks to his dedication and skill.”
You give me read access to the repo and tell me, in a paragraph, what worries you. That is when the clock starts.
An agent fleet reads the whole codebase, runs it, and breaks it on purpose to surface every candidate issue.
A senior engineer reviews every finding, throws out the noise, and ranks what is left by real-world risk. Anything genuinely serious falls back on me personally.
The written report lands and we spend thirty minutes on the phone going through it.