Matt Turley, Continuum. Updated 2026-11-05.
We sell Continuum Keep it running, so we say where the other options fit better. Links to other companies go to their own sites and carry no affiliate codes.
Sentry suits teams that want error tracking with usage-based overage billing. If that is not you, Better Stack suits small teams that want uptime checks, on-call alerts and error tracking from one vendor; LogRocket suits teams that mainly need frontend session replay tied to errors; PostHog suits teams that want product analytics, replay and error tracking under one usage-based bill. One more is covered below. The list is alphabetical and is not a ranking.
This page lists options for someone leaving Sentry, drawn from tools in the same area. We only include a tool when a page owned by the vendor backs our description of it, and we say where Sentry is the better fit.
We read each source on 2026-11-05. Prices and limits change often, so confirm on the vendor's own page before you buy. A figure marked "one source only" was not matched by a second publisher.
Before you switch, know what you would give up:
Pricing as reported for Sentry:
| Tool | What it is | Confirmed price | Suits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentry | Error tracking and application performance monitoring | Developer $0 [1]; Team $26 per month billed annually; $29 per month billed monthly [1] | Teams that want error tracking with usage-based overage billing |
| Better Stack | Uptime monitoring, logs and error tracking | Free $0 [4]; Responder seat $34 per month billed monthly; $29 per month billed yearly [4] | Small teams that want uptime checks, on-call alerts and error tracking from one vendor |
| LogRocket | Session replay and frontend monitoring | Free $0 [5]; Team from $69 per month [5] | Teams that mainly need frontend session replay tied to errors |
| PostHog | Product analytics with session replay and error tracking | Free allowance (monthly) $0 [6]; Usage above free $0.005 per recording after the first 5k [7] | Teams that want product analytics, replay and error tracking under one usage-based bill |
| Rollbar | Error tracking | Free $0 [8] | Teams that want error-only tracking with a small free tier |
| Continuum Keep it running (ours) | Managed monitoring and patching | Keep it running $500/mo [9] | A founder who wants someone else to watch the app and respond when it breaks |
Better Stack combines uptime monitoring, status pages, incident alerting, logs, traces, error tracking and session replay in one product.[4]
Limits and things to check:
Pricing as reported for Better Stack:
Plan limits are longer than fit here and some sources disagree on them, so read the limits on the vendor pricing page.
Suits small teams that want uptime checks, on-call alerts and error tracking from one vendor. That is our reading of the facts above, not something a source says.
LogRocket records user sessions in web apps and ties them to errors and performance data.[5]
What the sources say:
Limits and things to check:
Pricing as reported for LogRocket:
Suits teams that mainly need frontend session replay tied to errors. That is our reading of the facts above, not something a source says.
PostHog is a product analytics platform that also offers session replay, error tracking and feature flags, with usage-based pricing.[6]
What the sources say:
Limits and things to check:
Pricing as reported for PostHog:
Suits teams that want product analytics, replay and error tracking under one usage-based bill. That is our reading of the facts above, not something a source says.
Rollbar groups and reports application errors, with plans priced by monthly error occurrence volume.[8]
What the sources say:
Limits and things to check:
Pricing as reported for Rollbar:
Suits teams that want error-only tracking with a small free tier. That is our reading of the facts above, not something a source says.
Stay with Sentry if it matches your situation: it suits teams that want error tracking with usage-based overage billing. Switching costs time, and none of the options above is better for everyone.
We make Continuum Keep it running. Weigh what we say here with that in mind. The tools above are the better choice when you want software you run yourself; ours is the better choice when you want a person to do or read the work.
A monthly retainer where a person handles monitoring, security and dependency patching, and incident triage for an app.[9]
What our own page says:
Limits and things to check:
Pricing as reported for Continuum Keep it running:
Suits a founder who wants someone else to watch the app and respond when it breaks.