Matt Turley, Continuum. Updated November 5, 2026.
What a good reviewer looks at, what to ask for in writing, and the red flags to refuse.
A senior engineer with production experience in your stack who did not write the code and does not profit from selling you the fix. They should read the database rules, sign-in, payments and hosting, and give you a written ranked list. The AI tool that wrote the code is a poor reviewer of itself.
A list in plain English ranking each finding by what it risks, the fix for each, and a way to confirm each is closed. You should be able to hand it to any developer and have them start the same day. Ask what was not reviewed too, because a review that does not say its limits is hiding them.
An AI tool will happily review its own work and find a few things. It tends to share the blind spots that produced the code, and it does not know what your business is supposed to allow. Use it as a first pass, then have a person who understands production check the parts that cost you customers or money.
Independence matters too. A reviewer who is paid only if you hire them to repair may find more than exists. Our own Ship Check is a flat $299 for the written read, and you can take that document to anyone.
Paste your live app URL and your email. A short automated check runs three public-security spot-checks and sends back one specific finding and what to do about it. It is free, and it is a preview, never a clean bill of health.
Run the free is-it-safe-to-ship check. Or book a call and talk it through.